Thursday 30 July 2009

Reasons for an IR

The integrated resorts sparked a major debate when they were first proposed, with the government reversing its previous stand against gambling. The government argued that the integrated resorts would help make Singapore a more attractive destination for tourists, thus providing a boost to the economy. It also insisted that the gambling aspect would only be a small section but would nevertheless be necessary to keep the resort profitable. Critics on the other hand, argued that having a casino would lead to gambling related crimes and create social problems.
I agree with the government’s decision. While gambling no doubt brings with it social ills, given today’s interconnected society, Singaporean gamblers can just take a bus to Genting and gamble there. In addition, there is already legalized betting as well as lotteries in Singapore which are also a form of gambling. Thus, having an integrated resort will not do much to increase this problem. Also, if Singaporeans gamble anyway, why not let them gamble at home where the money can be taxed and used to help the government.
Of course, just because the IR brings benefits does not mean the problems it brings can be ignored. Rather, measures must be taken to address them. Some of the problems include gambling addiction as well as a breakdown in the family unit. To tackle gambling addiction counseling centers can be publicized to increase awareness so addicts know where to find help. Also, the IR should ban those with financial difficulties or are gambling addicts from going in to gamble. They should impose an age limit to ensure children do not become influenced by their parents gambling.
In addition, to counter the negative effects of gambling on the family, there should be counseling offered to family members of gambling addicts to help them deal with the emotional and financial problems that may result.
In my opinion, the IR should not be scrapped merely because of a casino component, especially considering how other gambling alternatives already exist.

No comments:

Post a Comment